1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 59 P.3d
  5. 59 P.3d 33 (2002)
 

SATTERFIELD v. MEDLIN

No. 01-885.

59 P.3d 33 (2002)

2002 MT 260

Todd and Susan SATTERFIELD, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Ray MEDLIN d/b/a Ultimate Construction, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Decided November 22, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward A. Murphy, Datsopoulos, MacDonald & Lind, P.C., Missoula, Montana, for Appellants.

John E. Bohyer, Fred Simpson, Phillips & Bohyer, P.C., Missoula, Montana, for Respondent.

Justice JIM REGNIER delivered the Opinion of the Court.

¶ 1 Appellants Todd and Susan Satterfield ("Satterfields") filed a complaint against Respondent Ray Medlin ("Medlin"), doing business as Ultimate Construction, in the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, to recover damages as a result of Medlin's construction of a small log home. The Satterfields brought claims for breach of contract, breach of the implied warranty of habitability, and negligence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases