1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 122 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 122 Cal.Rptr.2d 802 (2002)
 

CITY OF RIPON v. SWEETIN

Nos. C036592, C037212.

122 Cal.Rptr.2d 802 (2002)

100 Cal.App.4th 887

CITY OF RIPON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Marshall C. SWEETIN et al. Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing August 26, 2002.

Review Denied November 26, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herum, Crabtree, Dyer, Zolezzi & Terpstra, Herum, Crabtree, Brown, Thomas H. Terpstra; Freeman, D'Aiuto, Pierce & Gurev, Freeman, D'Aiuto, Pierce, Gurev & Keeling, Maxwell M. Freeman, Ronald J. D'Aiuto and Thomas H. Keeling, Stockton, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Cassel Malm Fagundes and Joseph H. Fagundes, Stockton, for Defendants and Respondents.

SIMS, Acting P.J.

The dispute in these consolidated appeals involves (1) valuation of property taken in eminent domain for a highway interchange project, and (2) litigation costs. Plaintiff City of Ripon (City) valued the property at $190,000, with light industrial use being the "highest and best use" of the property. The property owners, defendants Marshall C. Sweetin and Billie A. Sweetin, asserted the value was $356,000, based on "highway commercial" use being...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases