CURREY v. CURREY

No. 22184.

650 N.W.2d 273 (2002)

2002 SD 98

Constance R. CURREY, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Shawn M. CURREY, Defendant and Appellant, Marvin Currey and Darlene Currey, Intervenors and Appellants.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Decided August 7, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wilson Kleibacker of Lammers, Lammers & Kleibacker, L.L.P., Madison, for plaintiff and appellee.

Thomas J. Linngren of Green, Schulz, Roby, Oviatt, Cummings & Linngren, Watertown, for defendant and appellant and intervenors and appellants.


SABERS, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Marvin and Darlene Currey (Grandparents) sought a modification of visitation rights with their two grandchildren, the children of their son, Shawn Currey, and his ex-wife, Connie. Connie answered and countered to terminate the visitation rights of Grandparents. The trial court determined that (1) SDCL 25-4-52, which provides for grandparent visitation, was unconstitutional and (2) terminated Grandparents' visitation rights. Grandparents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases