1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 121 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 121 Cal.Rptr.2d 794 (2002)
 

MATTEL, INC. v. LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS

No. B151826.

121 Cal.Rptr.2d 794 (2002)

99 Cal.App.4th 1179

MATTEL, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

June 28, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro, Marc Marmaro and Robert P. Baker for Defendant and Appellant Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps.

White, O'Connor, Curry, Giatti & Avanzado, Lee S. Brenner, Carl R. Benedetti and James E. Curry, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Appellant James B. Hicks.

Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart, Oliver & Hedges, Edith Ramirez, Michael T. Zeller and Adrian M. Pruetz, Redwood Shores, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

HASTINGS, J.

This action for malicious prosecution was filed by plaintiff/respondent Mattel, Inc. following entry of a judgment in favor of respondent against Harry R. Christian, plaintiff in an action for trademark infringement against respondent filed in the United States District Court, Central District of California, case No. CV 99-2820 NM (BQRx). Respondents Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, a limited liability partnership, and James B. Hicks, a former partner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases