STATE v. ROSE

No. 26831-1-II.

43 P.3d 48 (2002)

110 Wash.App. 878

STATE of Washington, Appellant, v. Wilbert ROSE, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

March 29, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Randall Avery Sutton, Kitsap County Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, for Appellant.

Joanne E. Dantonio, Crawford, McGilliard, Peterson, Yelish & Dixon (Court Appointed), Port Orchard, for Respondent.


MORGAN, J.

The question in this case is whether non compliance with CrR 3.3(f) waives the time limits prescribed by CrR 3.3. The answer is yes.

According to CrR 3.3(c)(2), a superior court must bring an in-custody defendant to trial within 60 days after arraignment, "less time elapsed in district court." According to the same rule, "time elapsed in district court" commences on the date a complaint is filed in district court and ends with the earlier of an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases