1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 789 A.2d
  5. 789 A.2d 119 (2002)
 

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE v. HAYES

No. 48, Sept. Term, 2000.

789 A.2d 119 (2002)

367 Md. 504

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. John A. HAYES, Jr.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

January 18, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel and James P. Botluk, Asst. Bar Counsel for the Atty. Grievance Com'n of Md., for petitioner.

Norman L. Smith, Esq. (Fisher & Winner, LLP), Baltimore, for respondent.

Argued Before BELL, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL and BATTAGLIA, JJ.

BELL, Chief Judge.

The only issue to be decided in this Attorney discipline case is the appropriate sanction to be imposed on the respondent, John A. Hayes, Jr., for violation of certain of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Maryland Rule 16-812,1 Maryland Code (1989, 2000 Replacement Volume) § 10-306 of the Business Occupations and Professions Article,2 commingling of funds,3

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases