Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's claim that the prosecutor engaged in misconduct during cross-examination is unpreserved for appellate review since the defendant made only general objections, did not request curative instructions when one objection was sustained, and did not move for a mistrial based upon the ground, asserted on appeal, that the trial court precluded him from making specific objections during trial (see People v Hunte,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.