1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 798 A.2d
  5. 798 A.2d 100 (2002)
 

UNIVERSAL FOLDING BOX CO. v. HOBOKEN CITY

798 A.2d 100 (2002)

351 N.J. Super. 227

UNIVERSAL FOLDING BOX CO., INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HOBOKEN CITY, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 24, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Tannenbaum, Monroe Township, argued the cause for appellant City of Hoboken (Zipp & Tannenbaum, attorneys; Mr. Tannenbaum, of counsel; Mr. Tannenbaum and Joseph P. Horan, II, on the brief).

Steven R. Irwin, West Orange, argued the cause for respondent (Mandelbaum & Mandelbaum, attorneys; Mr. Irwin, on the brief).

Before Judges WEFING, CIANCIA and PARRILLO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by WEFING, J.A.D.

Defendant City of Hoboken (Hoboken) appeals from five judgments entered in the Tax Court on September 15, 2000 setting the assessed value for property owned by Universal Folding Box Co., Inc. (Universal) for the tax years 1994 through 1998.1 The result of the judgments in question is to entitle Universal to a refund of more than $450,000. We have reviewed the record and are satisfied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases