1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 648 N.W.2d
  5. 648 N.W.2d 249 (2002)
 

WEINBERGER v. MAPLEWOOD REVIEW

No. C7-01-2021.

648 N.W.2d 249 (2002)

Richard WEINBERGER, Respondent, and Independent School District No. 622, et al., Defendants, v. MAPLEWOOD REVIEW, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 18, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen W. Cooper, Stacey R. Everson, The Cooper Law Firm, Chartered, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Mark R. Anfinson, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by STONEBURNER, Presiding Judge, HARTEN, Judge, and ANDERSON, Judge.

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

Appellant Wally Wakefield, a reporter, appeals from the district court's order compelling him to disclose, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 595.025 (defamation exception to the Free Flow of Information Act), which defendant, if any, is the source of statements in a news article. Because respondent Richard Weinberger has failed to establish that the exception applies, we reverse.

FACTS

The Maplewood Review

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases