Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the suppression hearing should have been reopened based on the trial testimony of the eyewitness who identified the defendant's car to the arresting officer is unpreserved for appellate review. The defendant failed to ask the trial court to reopen the hearing based on the eyewitness's trial testimony (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Lopez,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.