1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 115 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 115 Cal.Rptr.2d 780 (2002)
 

FRAZEE v. SEELY

No. G025981.

115 Cal.Rptr.2d 780 (2002)

95 Cal.App.4th 627

Debra L. FRAZEE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Hall SEELY et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

January 25, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Thomas P. Dovidio and Thomas P. Dovidio, Whittier, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, Gregory H. Halliday and Ralph A. Guirgis, Irvine, for Defendants and Respondents Hall Seely, Katia Diehl and Seely & Russell.

Callahan, McCune & Willis and Neal C. Swensen, Tustin, for Defendants and Respondents Michelle Elizabeth Hales, Robert P. Etienne and Hales, Hales & Etienne.

OPINION

RYLAARSDAM, Acting P.J.

Plaintiff Debra L. Frazee appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendants Hall Seely, Katia Diehl, the law firm of Seely & Russell (S & R), Michelle Elizabeth Hales, Robert P. Etienne, and the law firm of Hales, Hales & Etienne (H, H & E). Frazee contends the court erred by granting summary judgment in her malpractice action for the following reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases