1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 46 P.3d
  5. 46 P.3d 832 (2002)
 

STATE v. GAUT

No. 19561-9-III.

46 P.3d 832 (2002)

111 Wash.App. 875

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. James L. GAUT, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Six.

May 23, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Janet G. Gemberling, Spokane, for Appellant.

Kevin M. Korsmo, Andrew J. Metts, III, Deputy Prosecuting Attorneys, Spokane, for Respondent.

SWEENEY, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to withdraw a plea. The standard governing our review is abuse of discretion. But the assignments of error and argument set out in James Gaut's brief have nothing to do with the denial of his motion to withdraw the plea. They focus instead on the underlying and unappealed judgment and sentence. And the time for direct appeal on both has long since run. We therefore dismiss the appeal.

FACTS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases