Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the trial court committed reversible error when, in its charge on burglary in the first degree (see Penal Law § 140.30 [2]), it failed to redact the language "or remain[ed]" from the element, "enter[ed] or remain[ed] unlawfully." This issue is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Rumph,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.