MORRISON v. RUDOLPH

No. G028285.

126 Cal.Rptr.2d 747 (2002)

103 Cal.App.4th 506

Jeffrey E. MORRISON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. George C. RUDOLPH et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

As Modified November 4, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John K. Saur, Laguna Hills, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, Randall A. Miller, and Douglas J. Collodel, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Respondents George C. Rudolph and the Rudolph Law Group.

Haight, Brown & Bonesteel, Roy G. Weatherup, Los Angeles, Bruce Cleeland, Santa Ana, Jon M. Kasimov and J. Alan Warfield, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent Haight, Brown & Bonesteel.


Certified for Partial Publication.*

OPINION

ARONSON, J.

Jeffrey and Marta Morrison contend the trial court erred by granting summary judgment against them on their malicious prosecution claim. The court ruled the underlying suit by a buyer—for damages allegedly stemming from construction defects the Morrisons failed to disclose when selling their condominium—...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases