1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 290 A.D.2d
  5. 290 A.D.2d 578 (2002)
 

PEOPLE v. ZABALA

290 A.D.2d 578 (2002)

735 N.Y.S.2d 244

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE ZABALA, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

Decided January 3, 2002.

Peters, J.

Defendant claims that the jury verdict was not supported by legally sufficient evidence and is contrary to the weight of the evidence. In determining legal sufficiency, we view the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621) in order to ascertain "whether there is any valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could lead a rational person to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases