1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 287 F.Supp.2d
  5. 287 F.Supp.2d 576 (2002)
 

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP. v. GENEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

Nos. 99-CV-02926, 99-CV-4303, 00-CV-1393, 00-CV-4888, 00-CV-5953, 00-CV-6464, 01-CV-159, 01-CV-10278, 01-CV-2169, 01-CV-2602, 01-CV-2981, 01-CV-3364, 01-CV-1484.

287 F.Supp.2d 576 (2002)

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and Beecham Group, P.L.C. v. GENEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. SmithKline Beecham Corporation v. Apotex Corporation, Apotex, Inc. and Torpharm, Inc. SmithKline Beecham Corporation and Beecham Group, P.L.C. v. Zenith Goldline Pharmaceuticals, Inc. SmithKline Beecham Corporation v. Apotex Corporation, Apotex, Inc. and Torpharm, Inc. SmithKline Beecham Corporation and Smithkline Beecham, P.L.C. v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc. SmithKline Beecham Corporation and SmithKline Beecham, P.L.C. v. Zenith Goldline Pharmaceuticals, Inc. SmithKline Beecham Corporation and SmithKline Beecham, P.L.C. v. Apotex Corporation, Apotex, Inc. and Torpharm, Inc. SmithKline Beecham Corporation and Beecham Group, P.L.C. v. Alphapharm Pty, Ltd. SmithKline Beecham, P.L.C. v. Apotex Corporation, Apotex, Inc. and Torpharm, Inc. SmithKline Beecham, P.L.C. v. Zenith Goldline Pharmaceuticals, and Sumika Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd. SmithKline Beecham Corporation and Beecham Group, P.L.C. v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Andrx Pharmaceuticals, L.L.C. and Basf Corporation SmithKline Beecham Corporation and SmithKline Beecham, P.L.C. v. Alphapharm Pty, Ltd. SmithKline Beecham, P.L.C. v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sumika Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

September 30, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur Makadon, Jamie B. Bischoff, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, Philadelphia, PA, Sally A. Steffen, Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Ford F. Farabow, Jr., Walter Y. Boyd, Jr., Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, Atlanta, GA, Kenneth M. Frankel, Richard B. Racine, Robert D. Bajefsky, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs.

Alan K. Cotler, Peggy B. Greenfeld, Reed Smith LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Patricia E. Campbell, Klett, Lieber, Rooney & Schorling, Philadelphia, PA, Peter F. Marvin, Marvin, Larsson, Hankin & Scheuritzel, Philadelphia, PA, Arlene Fickler, Hoyle, Fickler, Herschel & Mathes LLP, Wendi S. Meltzer, Hoyle, Morris & Kerr, Philadelphia, PA, John B. Starr, Jr., John C. Vetter, Lynne Darcy, Melissa L. Paddock, Steven J. Lee, Kenyon & Kenyon, New York, NY, Richard D. Kelly, William T. Enos, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier and Neustadt, P.C., Alexandria, VA, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SURRICK, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are the Motions of Plaintiffs SmithKline Beecham Corp., Beecham Group, P.L.C. and SmithKline Beecham, P.L.C. (collectively, "SmithKline") for Leave to Amend the Complaint and Join a Party Defendant in Civil Action Nos. 99-CV-2926 (Doc. No. 26), 00-CV-1393 (Doc. No. 34), 00-CV-5953 (Doc. No. 11) and 00-CV-6464 (Doc. No. 34 in 00-CV-1393). For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases