GREENLINING INSTITUTE v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

No. A098037.

127 Cal.Rptr.2d 736 (2002)

103 Cal.App.4th 1324

The GREENLINING INSTITUTE et al., Petitioners, v. The PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION of the State of California, Respondent; Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

Review Denied February 19, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Gnaizda, San Francisco, Itzel Berrio, The Greenlining Institute, Terry J. Houlihan, Thomas S. Hixon, Randall Hegarty, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, San Francisco, Susan E. Brown, Latino Issues Forum, for Petitioner.

Gary M. Cohen, Mary F. McKenzie, San Francisco, Judith Allen, for Respondent.

James B. Young, David A. Discher, Robert A. Mittelstaedt, Craig E. Stewart, Patrick S. Thompson, Pillsbury, Winthrop, San Francisco, for Real Party in Interest.


PARRILLI, J.

This petition for writ of review arises out of proceedings brought before the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) by several consumer groups and individual consumers against Pacific Bell (Pacific), alleging that Pacific engaged in deceptive marketing of its optional telephone services. The PUC determined that certain of Pacific's practices were unlawful and ordered prospective and retrospective relief.1

The Greenlining...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases