MOBIL OIL CORP. v. GREENWICH TP.


20 N.J. Tax 66 (2002)

MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF, v. GREENWICH TOWNSHIP, DEFENDANT. VALERO REFINING CO.-NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. GREENWICH TOWNSHIP, DEFENDANT.

Tax Court of New Jersey.

Decided: April 15, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Seth I. Davenport, for plaintiffs.

Peter J. Zipp for defendant Greenwich Township (Zipp & Tannenbaum, attorneys).

Saul A. Wolfe for intervenor New Jersey League of Municipalities (Skoloff & Wolfe, attorneys).

John R. Lloyd for Intervenor New Jersey Association of Municipal Assessors (Rosenblum, Wolf & Lloyd, attorneys).


SMALL, P.J.T.C.

The issue before me is whether the assessor of Greenwich Township may invoke the attorney-client privilege (N.J.R.E. 504, N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-20) in refusing to answer a question posed during his deposition conducted as part of a local property tax appeal.

I.

The facts and procedural history of this case are not complex. On February 1, 2001, as part of the litigation in which plaintiffs are challenging their tax assessments...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases