Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the disparity between the sentence offered to him as part of a plea offer and that imposed upon his conviction establishes that the trial court impermissibly penalized him for exercising his right to a trial. This contention is without merit. The comments by the trial court indicated that it did not improperly enhance the defendant's sentence based on his choice to go to trial. Rather, the sentence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
