1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 221 F.Supp.2d
  5. 221 F.Supp.2d 630 (2002)
 

U.S. FOR USE OF UNION LIGHT v. CAMCO CONST.

No. Civ.A. DKC 2001-3084.

221 F.Supp.2d 630 (2002)

UNITED STATES of America FOR the USE AND BENEFIT OF UNION LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY, et al. v. CAMCO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., et al.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

September 10, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric A. Frechtel, Robert J. Symon, Spriggs and Hollingsworth, Andrew North Cook, Law Office, Lawrence Michael Prosen, Bell Boyd and Lloyd PLLC, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs.

Carol L. O. Riordan, The O. Riordan Bethel Law Firm, Washington, DC, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHASANOW, District Judge.

Presently pending motions1 in this breach of contract action are (1) the motion of CamCo Construction Co., Inc. (CamCo) to intervene; (2) CamCo's motion to disqualify counsel; and (3) Plaintiff's motion to substitute counsel. For the reasons that follow, the motion to intervene will be denied as unnecessary, Plaintiff's motion to substitute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases