PEOPLE v. NICHOLAS


98 N.Y.2d 749 (2002)

781 N.E.2d 884

751 N.Y.S.2d 820

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. PETE NICHOLAS, Also Known as PETE NICHOLS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided October 17, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard R. Relin, District Attorney, Rochester (Wendy Evans Lehmann of counsel), for appellant.

Edward J. Nowak, Public Defender, Rochester (Timothy P. Donaher of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK, WESLEY, ROSENBLATT and GRAFFEO concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Once again we emphasize that prospective jurors who give some indication of bias but do not provide an unequivocal assurance of impartiality must be excused for cause.

During voir dire, the trial court instructed the prospective jurors to raise their hands in response to questions when responding affirmatively. When defense counsel addressed the panel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases