GAVALDON v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION

Nos. G026626, G027036.

115 Cal.Rptr.2d 732 (2002)

95 Cal.App.4th 544

Rosemarie GAVALDON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

Review Granted May 15, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Horvitz & Levy, Lisa Perrochet, John A. Taylor, Jr., Encino, and Jon B. Eisenberg, Oakland; Even, Crandall, Wade, Lowe & Gates, Douglas D. Guy and Matthew M. Proudfoot, Irvine, for Defendant and Appellant.

Anderson & Anderson and Martin W. Anderson, Santa Ana, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.


OPINION

O'LEARY, J.

In this case, we hold a service contract, supplementing the factory warranty accompanying a new car, is not an express warranty entitling the consumer to the replacement or restitution remedy contained in section 1793.2, subdivision (d) of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act. (Civ.Code, § 1790 et seq., hereafter Song-Beverly.)1

DaimlerChrysler Corporation (hereafter Chrysler) appeals a judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases