Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly denied his motion for leave to renew, as it was not based upon newly-discovered evidence and there was no adequate explanation for the defendant's failure to submit the purportedly new evidence at the time of the prior motion (see CPLR 2221 [e]; Scott v Avis Rent A Car,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.