1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 44 P.3d
  5. 44 P.3d 794 (2002)
 

STATE v. HOLLEN

No. 20000585.

44 P.3d 794 (2002)

2002 UT 35

STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Philip Earl HOLLEN, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of Utah.

March 29, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark L. Shurtleff, Att'y Gen., Jeanne B. Inouye, Asst. Att'y Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff.

Kent R. Hart, Karen Stam, Salt Lake City, for defendant.

DURRANT, Justice.

¶ 1 Phillip Earl Hollen was convicted of two counts of aggravated robbery based on four eyewitness identifications. On appeal, Hollen claims that the trial court erred (1) in concluding that the eyewitness identifications were sufficiently reliable to be admitted at trial consistent with the Due Process Clause of the Utah Constitution, and (2) in not allowing a defense expert to give an opinion on the reliability of the process of identification...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases