1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 97 N.Y.2d
  5. 97 N.Y.2d 739 (2002)
 

PEOPLE v. ORENGO

97 N.Y.2d 739 (2002)

769 N.E.2d 344

742 N.Y.S.2d 598

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JUAN ORENGO, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided March 21, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Legal Aid Society, New York City (Natalie Rea and Andrew C. Fine of counsel), for appellant.

Charles Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn (Victor Barall of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK, WESLEY, ROSENBLATT and GRAFFEO concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The Appellate Division properly determined that the sentencing court did not base its determination upon inaccurate information. Here, the record indicates that the sentencing court did not consider any of the prosecutor's inaccurate assertions in its sentencing determination, but predicated that sentence on the nature and details of the particular crime of

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases