Ordered that the order is affirmed.
After sentencing, the defendant moved pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel based on the court's denial of two applications for a Spanish interpreter, even though a courtroom interpreter had been provided to the defendant at different times. The Supreme Court denied the motion on both procedural and substantive grounds. The Supreme Court
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.