1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 287 F.3d
  5. 287 F.3d 543 (2002)
 

MULHALL v. ASHCROFT

No. 00-6634.

287 F.3d 543 (2002)

Michael A. MULHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: April 23, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Bolus, Jr. (argued and briefed), Thomas E. Clay (briefed), Bolus & Ragland, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellant.

Daniel Bensing (argued and briefed), Marleigh D. Dover (briefed), United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Before MOORE and COLE, Circuit Judges; TARNOW, District Judge.

OPINION

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Michael A. Mulhall appeals the grant of summary judgment on his Title VII retaliation claim. On the merits, we find no error in the district court's judgment with respect to Defendant Attorney General John Ashcroft because Mulhall failed to produce either direct or circumstantial evidence from which a reasonable factfinder could infer that his supervisors knew of his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases