1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 49 P.3d
  5. 49 P.3d 778 (2002)
 

IN RE CONDUCT OF HARRIS

(OSB 99-37, 99-62 to 99-64, 99-114 to 99-117; SC S46572).

49 P.3d 778 (2002)

334 Or. 353

In re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF David B. HARRIS, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.

Decided July 11, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Harris, Portland, argued the cause and filed briefs in propria persona.

W. Eugene Hallman, Hallman & Dretke, Pendleton, also argued the cause and filed briefs for the accused.

Steven W. Seymour, Samuels Yoelin Kantor, Portland, argued the cause for the Oregon State Bar. With him on the brief was Jane E. Angus, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, Lake Oswego.

PER CURIAM.

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, we address the question left open in In re Devers, 328 Or. 230, 233-34, 974 P.2d 191 (1999), whether a lawyer has a constitutional right to appointed counsel in a disciplinary proceeding. We conclude that an accused lawyer has no such constitutional right, and, further, we decline to require the appointment of counsel under our general authority...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases