Ordered that the order is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly denied his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) (g) to vacate his judgment of conviction based on newly-discovered evidence without conducting a hearing. The defendant failed to demonstrate that the evidence could not have been produced at trial with the exercise of due diligence (see People v Feliciano,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.