KAMERMAN v. VINA


290 A.D.2d 537 (2002)

736 N.Y.S.2d 627

RICHARD KAMERMAN et al., Appellants, v. ANDRE O. DE LA VINA et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided January 28, 2002.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied specific performance to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs failed to establish that they were ready, willing, and able to close title until the lis pendens on the property was cancelled, and that the underlying action to which the lis pendens related was discontinued (see, Huntington Min. Holdings v Cottontail Plaza, 60 N.Y.2d 997

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases