1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 798 A.2d
  5. 798 A.2d 26 (2002)
 

ANGELINI v. HARFORD COUNTY

No. 1497, Sept. Term, 2001.

798 A.2d 26 (2002)

144 Md. App. 369

Shirley ANGELINI v. HARFORD COUNTY, Maryland.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

May 7, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Gessner (Eric E. McLauchlin and Gessner, Snee, Mahoney & Lutche, P.A. on the brief), Bel Air, for appellant.

Margaret A. Attanasio, Love, Fleming, Bearsch & Attanasio, LLC, Bel Air, for appellee, Harford County.

J. Carroll Holzer, on the brief, Towson, for protestants.

Argued Before DAVIS, KRAUSER, and CHARLES E. MOYLAN, JR. (retired, specially assigned), JJ.

CHARLES E. MOYLAN, Jr., Judge, retired, specially assigned.

Our consideration of this appeal requires us to take a fresh look at the most rudimentary A, B, C's of the administrative process. What, before an administrative agency, is the difference between the burden of production and the burden of persuasion? To whom is allocated the burden of persuasion? What, if any, basis does an administrative tribunal require to justify its being unpersuaded?

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases