DAKOTA BANK v. EIESLAND

No. C0-01-1941.

645 N.W.2d 177 (2002)

DAKOTA BANK, Appellant, v. Carl EIESLAND, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 11, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susan E. Barnes, Sarah B. Stroebel, Lindquist & Vennum, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.

Thomas P. Kane, Hinshaw & Culbertson, Minneapolis, MN; and Edward J. Rolwes, Rosenblum, Goldenhersh, Silverstein & Zafft, P.C., St. Louis, MO, admitted pro hac vice, for respondents.

Considered and decided by HANSON, Presiding Judge, SCHUMACHER, Judge, and HUSPENI, Judge.


OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.*

Appellant bank's claims of respondent accountants' negligent and intentional misrepresentations, based on reliance on information contained in financial compilations prepared by respondents, were dismissed by the district court for failure to state claims on which relief can be granted. Appellant, in challenging that dismissal, argues that (a) the disclaimer should not shield accountants who knew or should...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases