Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the appellants' motion for leave to renew, as they offered no reasonable explanation as to why the alleged "new" evidence was not submitted with the prior motion (see CPLR 2221 [e]; Tri-State Consumer Ins. Co. v Singh,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.