SARATOGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
W. Charles HACKETT, Individually and as Trustee, etc., Defendant and Appellant.
Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 16, 2002.
As Modified on Denial of Rehearing May 14, 2002.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Ackerman & Kevorkian, Michael G. Ackerman, Kevin B. Kevorkian, San Jose, Attorney for Defendant/Appellant: W. Charles Hackett.
Matteoni, Saxe & O'Laughlin, Barton G. Hechtman, Norman E. Matteoni, San Jose, Attorneys for Plaintiff/Respondent: Saratoga Fire Protection District.
Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.
PREMO, Acting P.J.
Defendant W. Charles Hackett1 appeals judgment in an eminent domain proceeding brought by plaintiff Saratoga Fire Protection District in which defendant was not allowed to produce evidence that his Saratoga office building was worth $3.2 million at the time of trial. Defendant contends California's eminent domain law is unconstitutional as applied to him because the mandatory use of the date the complaint was filed as...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.