Donald R. KITTEN, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Wisconsin DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, Defendant-Respondent.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Oral argument February 4, 2002.
Decided May 24, 2002.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by Phil Elliott, Jr., and Elliott, Elliott & Staskunas, West Allis, and oral argument by Phil Elliott, Jr.
For the defendant-respondent the cause was argued by David C. Rice, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle, attorney general.
An amicus curiae brief was filed by Mary Dianne Greenley, Michael Bachhuber, and Monica Murphy, Madison, on behalf of the Wisconsin Coalition for Advocacy, Inc.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
¶ 1. JON P. WILCOX, J.
In this case, we review a court of appeals decision, Kitten v. DWD, 2001 WI App 218, 247 Wis.2d 661, 634 N.W.2d 583, which affirmed the administrative ruling of Department of Workforce Development (DWD) hearing examiner Alice E. DeLaO. The hearing examiner concluded that Donald R. Kitten had violated the Wisconsin...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.