KITTEN v. DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

No. 00-3562.

252 Wis.2d 561 (2002)

2002 WI 54

644 N.W.2d 649

Donald R. KITTEN, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. STATE of Wisconsin DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided May 24, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by Phil Elliott, Jr., and Elliott, Elliott & Staskunas, West Allis, and oral argument by Phil Elliott, Jr.

For the defendant-respondent the cause was argued by David C. Rice, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle, attorney general.

An amicus curiae brief was filed by Mary Dianne Greenley, Michael Bachhuber, and Monica Murphy, Madison, on behalf of the Wisconsin Coalition for Advocacy, Inc.


¶ 1. JON P. WILCOX, J.

In this case, we review a court of appeals decision, Kitten v. DWD, 2001 WI App 218, 247 Wis.2d 661, 634 N.W.2d 583, which affirmed the administrative ruling of Department of Workforce Development (DWD) hearing examiner Alice E. DeLaO. The hearing examiner concluded that Donald R. Kitten had violated the Wisconsin...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases