IN RE CONNELLY

No. SB-02-0055-D. Disc. Comm. No. 99-2417.

55 P.3d 756 (2002)

203 Ariz. 413

In the Matter of Thomas M. CONNELLY, Attorney No. 12987, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

August 9, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

State Bar of Arizona By Yigael M. Cohen, Director of Lawyer Regulation, Phoenix, Attorney for the State Bar of Arizona.

Hinshaw & Culbertson By Brian Holohan, Phoenix, Attorney for Thomas M. Connelly.

Thomas J. Marlowe, Phoenix, Attorney for Thomas M. Connelly.


OPINION

McGREGOR, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 This matter arose after Respondent Connelly's client filed a complaint with the State Bar, alleging that Respondent charged an unreasonably high fee. We granted review to determine whether, when a client who has contractually agreed to submit fee disputes to binding arbitration files a complaint alleging his lawyer charged an unreasonable fee, disciplinary proceedings should begin before fee arbitration proceedings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases