1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 67 Conn.
  5. 67 Conn. App. 742 (2002)
 

IN RE LATIFA K.

(AC 20950)

67 Conn. App. 742 (2002)

IN RE LATIFA K. ET AL.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Officially released January 29, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William R. Kinloch, for the appellant (respondent father).

Mary K. Lenehan, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, and Susan T. Pearlman, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (petitioner).

Foti, Schaller and O'Connell, Js.

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The respondent father1 appeals from the judgments of the trial court terminating his parental rights with respect to his minor children, L and S. On appeal, the respondent claims that the court improperly (1) denied his motion to amend the petitions to terminate his parental rights filed by the petitioner and (2) denied his request to strike a sentence in a social study as inadmissible hearsay. We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases