Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the trial court erroneously instructed the jurors on the elements of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (see Penal Law § 265.02 [1]), because it omitted any reference to his prior conviction, is not preserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]).
In any event, where, as here, "the fact that the defendant has been previously convicted of an offense...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
