MORLOCK v. ST. PAUL GUARDIAN INS. CO.

No. C2-01-340.

650 N.W.2d 154 (2002)

Dean E. MORLOCK, et al., Petitioners, Appellants, v. ST. PAUL GUARDIAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

August 29, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Krass & Monroe, P.A., Phillip R. Krass, C. John Jossart, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellant.

Bassford, Lockhart, Truesdell & Briggs, Michael A. Klutho, Charles E. Lundberg, Minneapolis, MN, for Respondent.

Meagher & Geer, P.L.L.P., William M. Hart, Minneapolis, MN, for Amicus Curiae—Minnesota Defense Lawyers Association.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.


OPINION

GILBERT, Justice.

This case involves whether or not the district court erred in giving an aggravation of a preexisting condition instruction based on CIVJIG 91.40 and, if so, whether a new trial is warranted. Appellants Dean E. Morlock and Judy A. Morlock brought suit against respondent St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company after Dean Morlock was injured in an automobile accident, seeking to recover underinsured motorist benefits for Dean Morlock's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases