1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 566 S.E.2d
  5. 566 S.E.2d 233 (2002)
 

PHARES v. BROOKS

No. 30318.

566 S.E.2d 233 (2002)

211 W.Va. 346

Christine B. PHARES, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Charles J. BROOKS and Charles L. Brooks, Guardian for Charles J. Brooks, Defendants Below, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

Decided June 17, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harley O. Staggers, Esq., Staggers & Staggers, Keyser, for Appellant.

Michele L. Dearing, Esq., E. Kay Fuller, Esq., Kenneth J. Ford, Esq., Martin & Seibert, L.C., Martinsburg, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM:

In this personal injury action, the appellant, Christine B. Phares, claims, among other things, that a member of the jury panel failed to respond properly to a voir dire question and that, as a consequence, the verdict which the jury ultimately rendered was tainted. After reviewing the facts of this case, this Court believes that the trial court should have conducted a hearing on the appellant's claim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases