LEUALLEN v. BOROUGH OF PAULSBORO

Civil No. 99-4353(JBS).

180 F.Supp.2d 615 (2002)

Timothy LEUALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BOROUGH OF PAULSBORO, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

January 10, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel A. Malat, Law Offices of Samuel A. Malat, Haddon Heights, NJ, for plaintiffs.

Richard L. Goldstein, Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, P.C., Cherry Hill, NJ, Allen E. Richardson, Woodbury, NJ, for defendants.


OPINION

SIMANDLE, District Judge.

When an attorney, in response to the Court's concern that his 34-page Complaint on behalf of multiple plaintiffs alleging various civil rights violations against various local police departments cannot be understood, responds nonetheless with a 160-page Amended Complaint compounding the difficulties and asserting claims that are legally and factually nonsensical, there will be consequences. This Opinion, issued following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases