STATE v. MITCHELL

No. 49496-1-I.

59 P.3d 717 (2002)

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. George MITCHELL, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

December 23, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Catherine Floit, David Koch, Nielsen, Broman & Koch, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Adrienne McCoy, King County Pros. Atty., Seattle, WA, for Respondent.


BECKER, C.J.

A judgment and sentence must be definite and certain. But a precise term of community custody cannot be specified at sentencing when it is contingent on the amount of early release time the defendant may earn while incarcerated. Appellant Mitchell contends that a sentence must at least state the maximum potential period of earned early release in order to notify the defendant as to the potential maximum period of community custody. We hold a sentence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases