POMEROY v. TANNER MASONRY

No. COA01-505.

565 S.E.2d 209 (2002)

Daniel POMEROY, Employee, Plaintiff v. Tanner MASONRY, Employer, USF & G Insurance, Carrier; Defendants.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 2, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bollinger & Piemonte, PLLC, by George C. Piemonte, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellee/cross-appellant.

Morris York Williams Surles & Barringer, LLP, by John F. Morris and Keith B. Nichols, Charlotte, for defendant-appellants/cross-appellees.


CAMPBELL, J.

Tanner Masonry (Employer) and USF & G Insurance (collectively, Defendants) appeal from a 19 December 2000 opinion and award of the North Carolina Industrial Commission (the Commission). Specifically, Defendants contend the Commission erred in concluding that Daniel Pomeroy (Plaintiff) is "entitled to reasonably necessary medical treatment related to his compensable injury by accident for so long as such treatment tends to effect a cure, provide relief...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases