Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion to quash the subpoena is granted in its entirety.
The subpoena duces tecum that was served upon the nonparty appellant was facially invalid and unenforceable, because it neither contained nor was accompanied by a notice setting forth the reason why such disclosure was sought (see CPLR 3101 [a] [4]; Matter of Ehmer,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.