1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 121 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 121 Cal.Rptr.2d 649 (2002)
 

GRABER v. CITY OF UPLAND

No. E029769.

121 Cal.Rptr.2d 649 (2002)

99 Cal.App.4th 424

William GRABER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF UPLAND et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

June 18, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James L. Markman, City Attorney; Richards, Watson & Gershon, Gregory M. Kunert and T. Peter Pierce, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Appellants.

C. Robert Ferguson, Claremont, for Plaintiff and Respondent William Graber.

Law Offices of Kathryn Reimann and Kathryn Reimann, Monterey; Alan K. Marks, County Counsel, and Michelle Blakemore, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent County of San Bernardino.

OPINION

HOLLENHORST, Acting P.J.

On June 28, 1999 the Upland City Council adopted ordinances 1683 and 1684. Ordinance 1683 amended the existing Town Center redevelopment plan by deleting 77 acres from the redevelopment area. Ordinance 1684 approved a new redevelopment plan, designated Project No. 7. Project No. 7 contained the 77-acre parcel, as well as 15 other noncontiguous parcels.

Plaintiffs William Graber and the County of San Bernardino (County...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases