Ordered that the order dated September 27, 2000, is affirmed, with one bill of costs.
Since the appellants failed to demonstrate the existence of a reasonable excuse for their default and a meritorious defense, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying their motion, inter alia, to vacate the prior orders discharging the original receiver as well as his successor (see Mary Immaculate Hosp. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.