APPLIED SIGNAL AND IMAGE v. HARLEYSVILLE MUT.

No. Civ.A. CCB-02-1944.

216 F.Supp.2d 534 (2002)

APPLIED SIGNAL AND IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. HARLEYSVILLE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

August 29, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter H. Gunst, Donna M.D. Thomas, Jonathan F. Monheit, Astrachan Gunst Thomas and Ahn, Baltimore, MD, for Plaintiff.

William Carlos Parler, Jr., Parler and Wobber LLP, Towson, MD, for Defendant.


MEMORANDUM

BLAKE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Applied Signal and Image Technology, Inc. ("ASIT") has sued Harleysville Mutual Insurance Co. ("Harleysville") for attorneys' fees and costs incurred in defending against a suit filed by Mr. Joseph Hejl, a shareholder and former corporate officer of ASIT. ASIT contends that Harleysville's duty to defend was triggered by the "false light" claim in Count IV of the Hejl complaint. Harleysville denies having...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases