AMES v. MILLER

No. 4:98-CV-0427-A.

184 F.Supp.2d 566 (2002)

Raymond L. AMES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Leonard D. MILLER, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division.

February 5, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond L. and Mary Anne Ames, Rebecca Ames, Joel Ames, Mazie Bailey, Lynette Barkell, Charles R. Barrows, Charles A. Barrows, Steve Bastrom, Lanell Borges, Michael Bowler, Wallace Branting, Jamie Chambers, David A. Cole, Gary Cole, Jonohn Cole, Adrien Corbett (Porthaven), Stevone Vukovitch de Aguirre, Valerie Cruz, Frederick Cupernall, US Dhillon MD Inc. M P Pension Plan, Helen and Stanley Dytrych, John A. and Jane L. Elder, Pat Elliott, Param Fagoora, Mona Fernandez, Michael Finazzo, Richard Hanson, Joseph and Sunny Higgins, Lori Ann Hiller, James and Judy Hoffman, James Ingram, Stacey Ann Keller-Moore, Orlin Kvamme, Trustee, Mitchell Langford, Trustee, Virginia Lee, Cherryl E. Lyons, Alma Manenica, Lindy and Diame Nelson, George and Ruth Noland, Robert O'Brien, Trustee, Dorothy Roemer, Antoniette Sherman (TMG, Trust), Robert Sherman, Bill Slaney, Aaron and Charlotte Snyder (ACES, Trust), Donna Taylor, Fred Tomlin, V. Hal Treadaway, Dennis Vaughn, Lloyd Vick, Nadarasa Visveshwara Family Trust, David Vogel, Robert Wolff, (TMG, Trust), Steve Yadeskie, pro se plaintiffs.

Robert V. DeTour, Claude D. Smith, Leonard D. Miller, pro se defendants.

D. Grant Seabolt, Jr., Simpson, Woolley & McConachie, Dallas, TX, for Charles A. Roberts and Bel-Air Trust.

John Patrick McDonald, Thomas George Yoxall, Karin Britt Torgerson, Locke, Liddell & Sapp, Dallas, TX, for Charles O. Shields and Ilonka J. Harezi.

Darrell D. Minter, Smith, Underwood & Perkins, Dallas, TX, for Brian Newman and Interbancoop Trust.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MCBRYDE, District Judge.

Before the court for consideration and determination are plaintiffs' motion for relief pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) and the motion of defendant Leonard D. Miller ("Miller"), in which defendant Charles O. Shields ("Shields") joined, for similar relief. The court has determined that the motions should be granted.

I.

The Motions

The court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases