KAPLAN v. QUEENS OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATES, P.C.


293 A.D.2d 449 (2002)

739 N.Y.S.2d 461

BRADLEY KAPLAN, Respondent, v. QUEENS OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATES, P.C., et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided April 1, 2002.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

It is well settled that "the granting or denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction does not constitute the law of the case or an adjudication on the merits of the claim for a permanent injunction and, therefore, the issues must be tried as if no application for a preliminary injunction had been made" (Ratner v Fountains Clove Rd. Apts., 118 A.D.2d 843...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases