McGOLDRICK v. LICATA


298 A.D.2d 439 (2002)

748 N.Y.S.2d 267

GRACE McGOLDRICK et al., Respondents, v. JOSEPH J. LICATA, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided October 15, 2002.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

"The [appellant's] contention that the jury verdict should be set aside as inconsistent is unpreserved for appellate review because the issue was not raised before the jury was discharged" (Devine v City of New York, 262 A.D.2d 443, 444; see Barry v Manglass, 55 N.Y.2d 803, 806; Grzesiak v General Elec. Co.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases